Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80800 invoked from network); 22 May 2008 03:38:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 May 2008 03:38:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 19744 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2008 03:38:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 19650 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2008 03:38:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 19639 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2008 03:38:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:38:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.241 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.241] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.241) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 03:38:04 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so3762906rvb.30 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:38:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZaK8M1JQ3upHmNEtVkXo3w31bS4khm0QQi56gK7AZDY=; b=LB52Q/khfbal4zUtCenrdL9d5Arouc8rVhZGO+i+HsnP07CxthpxreH9zHoZwacSfcwBSp52CSXPhQqILXnmJR94Xm5tJUc9UBACOjfNkisoL6mAxwWV4strywdc1x0Uappw91LIC5qnG0qWQiCV6wK9vhmrFq/QZZFHwHf5AqU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sVm2QbwduKNlurP01j8ld9VuNsrkquKy+dHsvhLxxNeydFFYq4LTuO2a/dgtH78NR1aYpFaAjHDMOb06nXS4jIr4VS6SzPW0P2CzfU1TuHHJv9ZVPiiPVvwQjX9WppM8q72Y45sy38yqccTL/gRfvOu/Sm38Hfh4kZU2CtpnvMM= Received: by 10.140.169.4 with SMTP id r4mr5546689rve.131.1211427500034; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.78.20 with HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 23:38:19 -0400 From: "Rahul Akolkar" To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Chain 1.2 based on RC1 In-Reply-To: <55afdc850805211703j418ac672pccf0a50878ccd4ae@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <55afdc850805201755x452b5056ob5311feab5d3445b@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850805211703j418ac672pccf0a50878ccd4ae@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/21/08, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > +0 > > > > We should upgrade all of our own dependencies to the latest ones when > > making releases, as far as possible. Especially the bottom tier ones > > like logging (in this case, to 1.1.1, which contains good number of > > fixes over 1.0.4). As indicated by my vote, I don't consider this to > > be a blocker. > > > OK, but its disappointing if thats the only thing that caused you to > vote +0 rather than +1. > Sigh, didn't mean to disappoint. FWIW, I've tried to say similar things for a while [1]. -Rahul [1] http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/DependencyCheck.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org