commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Filip Defoort" <filip...@cirquedigital.com>
Subject Re: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode
Date Wed, 21 May 2008 12:56:39 GMT
Hi Mario,

On 5/21/08, Mario Ivankovits <mario@ops.co.at> wrote:
> So, my questions are:
> * [ ] Do you agree that such an evolution might make sense
> * and if so, should I
> ** [ ] add a VFS-global (static) flag to enable this wrapper-like-mode or
> ** [ ] can I fork VFS to put the current head into maintainance (or more
> correct "dormant") mode and start with e.g. VFS 2.0?
>

This sounds great - I think what you're describing makes a lot of
sense (and would actually solve some long standing bugs + performance
issues).

Since the behavior may drastically change, I'd suggest to fork and go
for VFS 2.0 rather than a static flag.

Cheers,
- Filip

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message