Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14987 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2008 00:46:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Apr 2008 00:46:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 37818 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2008 00:46:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 37739 invoked by uid 500); 27 Apr 2008 00:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 37724 invoked by uid 99); 27 Apr 2008 00:46:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:46:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phil.steitz@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.174] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:45:47 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so3504871wfc.27 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:46:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5g5hFmz50tJT9bQ7K7/OH6YBuj+g12aBELsvr1DavMs=; b=DuYeFvB3AcoN+d9EUNsa8b268lvIQepn/ngii7n5luEfKkgM8EeXr8aYmyhwBqmb0Wivl6SnI67irUDZAiOUNU0RcToQmfpJW35n2Vou150eY5sJOQCDGsspmdAj8oFxfUwrIIR4iW1TKyOwcmfXhgJLWXrUpfka7gNj2GFC8A0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hM9AXkxkOqwnOhYro8ac3n8CePva/Jis2VXyzmKh5+xg3WEbbFUBMJU4iWp7BiMBSYeS1IlgiktQnu4a3brT0D3DyE3w81xJxUYfmebaQfmfT1DXQE22SIoBzyKg+WV88aCo7T70yrkJ/q9wfl+2RRPGL3u+vlxWPK9OLfci8Xk= Received: by 10.142.174.8 with SMTP id w8mr1667660wfe.5.1209257160973; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.133.19 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a81b4af0804261746r3755b215j298484ae908c78af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:46:00 -0700 From: "Phil Steitz" To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [math] Drop m1 build in 2.0 branch? In-Reply-To: <31cc37360804261738vf54d415gd2ee1c4eb14ab32a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8a81b4af0804261646k622f765cn2a32275aac3ceb15@mail.gmail.com> <31cc37360804261738vf54d415gd2ee1c4eb14ab32a@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Not from me. > > My opinion is that once a component has had an M2 release, it should > drop its M1 build system. > > Once it no longer needs Ant for earlier JDKs, it should also drop its Ant build. I agree with the first part, but not the second. I think that we should try to maintain working Ant builds. Phil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org