commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject Re: [functor] Revisited?
Date Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:27:34 GMT
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>  I've actually been thinking the same thing--if we get
>  other issues sorted out before adding generics code.
>  I'm just trying to keep my personal desire for a
>  1.3-compatible release from infringing too much on
>  others who may not want it.  I actually don't have
>  much to gain from such a release, but a) you never
>  know what you'll need tomorrow/next week/year, and b)
>  I've yet to find anything in the codebase that says
>  IMMATURE! to me, so I don't see why we can't resolve
>  any issues fairly quickly.  If we're that close to
>  being able to provide a working implementation, why
>  shouldn't we?
>

I'm +1 on releasing a 1.0 version.  It seems a shame to tear up other
people's hard work so flippantly. :)  I think the API is pretty good
as-is from what I've used in the past.  We should make sure the code
coverage is pretty good, though.  Why didn't this ever graduation into
proper in the first place?  Not enough community?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message