commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [functor] Revisited?
Date Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:51:13 GMT

--- James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Matt Benson
> <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >  Good questions!  I suppose that's the thing to
> do,
> >  with the understanding that my pushing this makes
> me
> >  liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's
> needed
> >  to get that branch releasable, huh?
> >
> 
> So, how will this work if we want to promote this
> thing to the proper?

To be honest, I'm not sure why [functor] was never
ready to graduate, but I intend to get a better idea
of its true status during the next week or so...

>  Do we promote based on the 1.0 code?

If for some reason the generics branch is ready before
the 1.0, perhaps we can cross that bridge when we come
to it?

>  We can't do a
> release out of
> the sandbox, correct?

Correct.

>  Or, does it even matter that
> we'll have two
> active branches (trunk and the non-genericized 1.0
> branch) before
> promotion?

I don't see that it really matters.  :)

>  This is somewhat of a weird situation.
> 
Agreed.  :)  I specialize in those.

-Matt

>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No
Cost.  
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message