commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [functor] Revisited?
Date Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:30:39 GMT

--- James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> So, what version would you use for the
> non-genericized functor?  1.0?
> Then, the genericized version should be 2.0 (with
> o.a.c.functor2
> package names)?

Good questions!  I suppose that's the thing to do,
with the understanding that my pushing this makes me
liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's needed
to get that branch releasable, huh?

-Matt

> 
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Matt Benson
> <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Guys, I don't care what happens where--we can use
> >  trunk for generics work, but I would like the
> option
> >  of finishing a non-generic version of the lib
> (branch
> >  is fine by me) so we can evaluate the difficulty
> of
> >  swapping it out for the similar parts of a (also
> >  non-generic) Collections 4.0.
> >
> >  -Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >  --- James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >  > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:06 PM, sebb
> >  > <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > >  I'd suggest leaving them with the Java
> files,
> >  > assuming that they are
> >  > >  related to each other.
> >  > >  [JMeter has some beans with related property
> >  > files; these are easy to
> >  > >  maintain because the files are all in the
> same
> >  > directory. It would be
> >  > >  a bit of a pain otherwise.]
> >  > >
> >  > >  src/main/resources seems more suitable for
> common
> >  > resources shared by
> >  > >  lots of files.
> >  > >
> >  > >  BTW, +1 to reviving the project.
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > Since there are so many folks interested in
> reviving
> >  > it, do you guys
> >  > want to split up the work of "genericizing" the
> >  > classes?  We could
> >  > split it up by packages?
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >  > dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >  > For additional commands, e-mail:
> >  > dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >  >
> >  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >      
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> >  You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you
> one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
> > 
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
> >
> > 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >  For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@commons.apache.org
> 
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No
Cost.  
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message