commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [functor] Revisited?
Date Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:50:58 GMT
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:46 AM, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>  >  Good questions!  I suppose that's the thing to do,
>  >  with the understanding that my pushing this makes me
>  >  liable if I don't get off my ass and do what's needed
>  >  to get that branch releasable, huh?
>  >
>
>  So, how will this work if we want to promote this thing to the proper?
>   Do we promote based on the 1.0 code?  We can't do a release out of
>  the sandbox, correct?  Or, does it even matter that we'll have two
>  active branches (trunk and the non-genericized 1.0 branch) before
>  promotion?  This is somewhat of a weird situation.

I would say work on it in the Sandbox until its ready for a release.
Then put if up for a vote to promote to proper, if that succeeds then
you can release after that. Not sure about how you go about handling
two versions though. Guess thats something you need to work out
between you and Matt.

Niall

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message