commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [site] Dependency pages
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:34:46 GMT
On 3/18/08, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > I liked the m1 dependency page version [1] better than the m2 one [2].
>  >  The latter seems a bit noisy from the user PoV, and is mildly
>  >  incorrect in some places, such as the dependency tree and transitivity
>  >  of optionality.
>  >
>  >  I'd like to get other opinions.
>  >
>
>
> The M1 format is a bit easier to read, apart from the fact that the
>  different uses (compile test etc) of the jars are all mixed up. I
>  think the M2 layout is better for that.
>
<snip/>

Yup, simple but sorted in alphabetical order of artifactId. Requires
focusing on last column (comments).

-Rahul



>  Not sure I see the point of the group-id on the M2 format, and the
>  classifier should definitely be dropped.
>
>  The M2 "Dependency Listings" section does not appear to be in any
>  particular order, and is currently not very useful owing to gaps in
>  the data.
>
>  The M2 "Dependency File Details" section is strange.
>  What does the "Debug" column mean? Is it relevant to users?
>  What does the JDK rev mean? Is it compile-target or minimum Java version?
>
>  I like the idea of the M2 "Java version" section, but it ought to be
>  accurate, e.g. built from manually provided data rather than whatever
>  happens to be in SVN at the time it is generated.
>
>
>
>  >  -Rahul
>  >
>  >  [1] http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc2/site/dependencies.html
>  >  [2] http://commons.apache.org/scxml/dependencies.html
>  >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message