commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jörg Schaible <>
Subject RE: [configuration] New hierarchical configurations
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:19:20 GMT
Oliver Heger wrote:
< about the naming: If all our configurations are hierarchical (at least
> this is the plan currently), there does not seem to be much point in
> calling a concrete implementation
> "HierarchicalConfiguration". Therefore
> I used the name "InMemoryConfiguration" for the replacement (because
> the whole data is stored as ConfigurationNode objects in memory).


> In the first discussions about the new configuration2 branch somebody
> suggested using a different package structure, which is more
> focused on
> modularity, i.e. there should be packages containing configuration
> implementations with a specific functionality. I would like to follow
> this suggestion. Any objections or further comments?


- Jörg

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message