commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Torsten Curdt <>
Subject Re: [proxy] sfl4j-like discovery for ProxyFactory...
Date Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:28:23 GMT

On 08.03.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:

> All,
> The wicket folks are investigating using Commons Proxy and they don't
> want to have to decide which implementation (jdk, cglib, javassist) to
> use themselves.  They would like us to split up Commons Proxy into 3
> jars, commons-proxy, commons-proxy-cglib, commons-proxy-javassist.
> Any thoughts?

Is the discovery such a big problem with proxy? general I  
prefer the static discovery type. But someone has to do it.

My 2 cents


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message