commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:20:33 GMT
On Feb 5, 2008 6:09 PM, Gary Gregory <GGregory@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pemberton@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 9:52 AM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: Re: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2008 5:49 PM, Gary Gregory <GGregory@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > Should we come up with a general package naming convention for all commons
> > projects and Java 5?
> > >
> > > Either:
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons.io2
> > > org.apache.commons.lang2
> > > org.apache.commons.[project]2
> > >
> > > Or:
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons2.io
> > > org.apache.commons2.lang
> > > org.apache.commons2.[project]
> > >
> > > Where the minimum requirement will be Java 5, or perhaps:
> > >
> > > org.apache.commons5.io
> > > org.apache.commons5.lang
> > > org.apache.commons5.[project]
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > I think the packages shoud stay "org.apache.commons" - how about using
> > "v" as the qualifier - roman numeral for five - so
> >
> > org.apache.commons.iov
> > org.apache.commons.langv
> > org.apache.commons.[project]v
> >
> > Niall
>
> A long time ago, in that other galaxy, I worked on a product called 'Smalltalk/V', and
guess what some people called it? 'Smalltalk Five', where in fact the 'V' stood for Virtual.
So I know folks are going to ask what /is/ the difference is between 'lang' and 'lang vee'
;-) Since it is not called 'Java V (roman numeral)', we should not, IMO, have Project V, so
if we do want to put a suffix, I'd say a number would be better that a letter.

OK well I'm happy with "org.apache.commons.io2"

Niall

> Gary
>
>
> >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pemberton@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:47 PM
> > > > To: Commons Developers List
> > > > Subject: [io] 2.0 Moving to minimum of JDK 1.5
> > > >
> > > > We've discussed moving to a minimum of JDK 1.5 for IO 2.0 previously -
> > > > theres also an JIRA report here:
> > > >    http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-140
> > > >
> > > > From memory the preference was to move to a new package name  - how
> > > > about "org.apache.commons.io2"?
> > > >
> > > > Are there any objections to me creating an IO 1.4 branch from the
> > > > current trunk and then starting work on IO 2.0 in the trunk.
> > > >
> > > > Initial plans would be:
> > > >
> > > >  - rename to the new package
> > > >  - remove deprecated items
> > > >  - Making appropriate JDK 1.5 changes (generics, using StringBuilder
> > > > and new Appendable for Writers etc).
> > > >
> > > > Niall
> > > >
> > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message