Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15997 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 09:36:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 09:36:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 51949 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2008 09:36:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51432 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2008 09:36:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51423 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2008 09:36:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:36:18 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.75.86.161] (HELO vafer.org) (208.75.86.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:35:52 +0000 Received: from p5b03debb.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.3.222.187]:56115 helo=[192.168.1.131]) by vafer.org with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JGt4N-0001Mb-NU for dev@commons.apache.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:35:56 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) In-Reply-To: <4794610D.3040008@bestsolution.at> References: <47692CCB.7020608@apache.org> <55afdc850712191242k32107b51pa1d4f83291bedb0a@mail.gmail.com> <8ED8F00A-73D1-4BB9-BA79-7D805060E11F@apache.org> <476A73F1.4000801@apache.org> <4c39e3030712200601m6ee67bd4jd8233f04bf841668@mail.gmail.com> <476A7830.8010500@apache.org> <4774EDAB.1060208@apache.org> <1a5b6c410712280639h139c7e20p1ac40a3a9c58c148@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850801170850l2d614e9ep9efd3df9c403e046@mail.gmail.com> <47945445.5030400@bestsolution.at> <2A976906-8326-4DE8-B262-9D6C940BD774@apache.org> <4794610D.3040008@bestsolution.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Torsten Curdt Subject: Re: Support for OSGi Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:36:21 +0100 To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 21.01.2008, at 10:08, Tom Schindl wrote: > Hi Torsten, > > I understand this but we are seeing many J2EE-Servers adopting OSGi > and many applications > (I admit most of them in Eclipse-world) also. It seems strange to > me in those envs to use this "artificial" > package to overcome jar-hell (which is the only reason for the > java5-package right?) they are not having > because of OSGi. Hm.... not sure why its such a big deal to have e.g. o.a.commons.lang2 or similar. If you use an IDE that manages imports you will barely notice anyway. While it's great that OSGi adoption is getting better I still don't believe it's something Commons should rely on. At least that's my opinion. cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org