Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <47865FAE.7040404@oliver-heger.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:10:54 +0100
From: Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release commons-fileupload 1.2.1 (rc3)
References: <e75283b10801091814v79fd3151tf56287d81bbf8134@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e75283b10801091814v79fd3151tf56287d81bbf8134@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The artifacts look all good to me.

So if a solution/consensus for the problems with NOTICE is found, I am
+1 for this release.

Oliver

Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have prepared a third release candidate of commons-fileupload
> 1.2.1. A list of changes since rc2 and things that I haven't changes,
> can be found below.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jochen
> 
> 
> [ ] +1
> [ ] =0
> [ ] -1
> 
> 
> - The pom and jar files of commons-io 1.3.2 have been deployed
>   again to the m2 repository, this time to the groupId commons-io.
>   (No vote was needed, because the artifacts haven't been changed:
>   The pom file already contained this groupId, but was deployed to
>   the wrong path.)
> - The groupId of commons-io was changed to commons-io in the
>   m1 and m2 pom files of commons-fileupload.
> - The binary distribution do now contain the jar files. (Previously, they
>   did not.)
> - The NOTICE.TXT file contains the year 2008 now.
> 
> 
> I haven't responded to the following comments:
> 
> 
>>- When building with the different build systems the resulting jar
>>does not always include the license files: The maven 1 build is
>>okay, the maven 2 build does not include LICENSE and NOTICE,
>>and the ant build only includes NOTICE.
> 
> 
> This is as intended. The m2 poms activate inclusion of the LICENSE
> and NOTICE files only if -Prelease or -Prc is used on the command line.
> This is fine, because they are mainly required for *distributions*, which
> are endorsed by the ASF.
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org