commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jochen Wiedmann" <>
Subject Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:56:53 GMT
On Jan 9, 2008 11:16 PM, Dennis Lundberg <> wrote:

> No, not in my opinion. We've agreed to disagree on which way to go with
> this. There are two option, each with its merits and flaws.
> A) Use maven-remote-resources-plugin
> B) Keep manually edited files in SVN and copy them manually to the
> correct places
> If supporting one of these (A) isn't allowed in the parent pom, then why
> should the other (B) be supported?

Although I agree with your preference for the
maven-remote-resources-plugin, I strongly disagree with the resolution
to not handle these things in the commons-parent pom. If there is no
other way to resolve that, then I'd be in favour for a majority vote.

Your suggestion below is, IMO, a variant of (B). If you're happy with
it, I am well.


Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.

    -- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message