commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rahul Akolkar" <>
Subject Re: Cobertura + downloaded sites concern
Date Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:41:48 GMT
On 1/19/08, Henri Yandell <> wrote:
> Just wanting to share concern about a couple of things:
> 1) Using Cobertura. It's reports are GPL.
> 2) Including sites in downloads.
> If we have a component with Cobertura turned on, and with the site
> included in the distribution, then things are very unhappy.
> Findbugs doesn't seem to be the same issue - it's LGPL, but the
> reports don't appear to contain any LGPL JavaScript.

See Niall's effort at doing similar for Cobertura reports here:

> Do we want to play it safe and either not include Cobertura (and other
> reports with similar problems), or not have downloaded sites?

I chose the former for [scxml].

> Or keep
> it as it is and make this something we have to look at on every RC
> check?

We don't need another point of failure ;-) IMO, worth picking one of
the two (or three) options above now (choice may not be the same for
all components).


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message