commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 7
Date Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:32:51 GMT
On Jan 8, 2008 4:11 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 3:11 AM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 8, 2008 10:50 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In removing the remote-resources-plugin I ommitted to add back local
> > > > resource configuration for the NOTICE.tx and LICENSE.txt files.
> > > > Because of this I would like to do another release of commons-parent.
> > > > Apologies for this.
> > >
> > > +1, because I agree that this must be fixed ASAP.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sorry, if I am coming up with this question so late. Nevertheless:
> > > Does the current parent pom deal with adding NOTICE.txt and
> > > LICENSE.txt to the javadoc jar files?
> >
> > No - but AIUI it doesn't need to since it only contains the generated
> > javadoc and not anything we develop.
>
> Javadoc is full of copyright - that's why it's the part of spec jars

Yes and we have our copyright notice on every page.

> we can't replicate. Just because it's a secondary artifact doesn't
> change that - so I bet we should have the files in the javadoc jars.

Well it just seems like rule-making gone mad and I bet if you went
looking thru' all the m2 generated javadoc jars in the ASF distro dirs
then none would have it.

Niall

> Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message