Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54571 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2007 17:07:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2007 17:07:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 51158 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2007 17:07:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51075 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2007 17:07:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 51066 invoked by uid 99); 11 Dec 2007 17:07:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:07:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rahul.akolkar@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:06:56 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so1468747nfc for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:06:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=6GIiO/flLacf+zr+IfI2uGnLTjgJ1x6E/BFCoXxM8dU=; b=n86XhdgcJieyBFqnU0cJmQLZt1L/vncm9eekAKbyq8ZC4l+kkfwAmS+u7XGtPt3n7qyE3w5u++2LCRls0JDoPjn0v24zg2eUBsK547gSr/ShyoFogNFEZQDx8ZsHW8y0OwlnV/2SBBEgGfNTvgoLoIiNhFLog90U2BAhAECRg9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JgkzOAOUvJEP8l2175dZkZwWQEpkgLfqhHsS+VfmmZ6cjASixLwvAU12+CD70gfcjyUmeyH12E3WezUe9QAs+RshKCnWRkZ9ZAR+rUJPmb0ko3+GXLeh75yYf3y18TLMdOlkscpQ/1uS7P9pdb7AxQNrM12FeHYirszLa0dX9ec= Received: by 10.82.190.2 with SMTP id n2mr5076725buf.1197392817707; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.140.3 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:06:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:06:57 -0500 From: "Rahul Akolkar" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available In-Reply-To: <25aac9fc0712110604g8f2bc87o5d1b39c2b8a998d8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <25aac9fc0712081102u1681e941o4cd2b9f2d286602d@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0712081245q674852eas217b8a1fe9e607d5@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850712110434k6f6fc998w18dbaffd9e0b43d9@mail.gmail.com> <25aac9fc0712110604g8f2bc87o5d1b39c2b8a998d8@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Two replies in one ... On 12/11/07, sebb wrote: > On 11/12/2007, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > On Dec 8, 2007 9:44 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > > > > I'll cut RC2 mid next week (to allow for any other feedback between > > > now and then) that has the pom.xml in the source distros. Please feel > > > free to try out the pom and update it as you see fit within the next > > > 2-3 days (I haven't tried the m2 site for example, don't intend to > > > either for v0.7 etc.). > > > > +1 from me to include the pom.xml > > > > I just ran mvn site assembly:assembly (on trunk) and it all looked > > good except that the 0.7 release menu was missing from the site - so I > > just added it (copied from navigation.xml). > > Thanks for taking a look Niall, and for the site.xml update. > > The only issue I could see was the cobertura (http://tinyurl.com/2a9ctf) > > one:Al > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/site/cobertura/js/ > Thanks for the reminder :-) > > I thought at first that the JS files were only present on the web-site, but > that is included in the binary distribution. > One way to get round the problem of releasing the JS files would be to > exclude cobertura from the release archive. > I would not have thought it was essential to have it in the archive, as it's > available on the website. > > Just a thought. > Yup, that would be a nice solution, but that sort of thing can be more easily done with m2 (say, by introducing a dev / site profile). Given the current release plan (m1), I'll be removing the report altogether. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org