commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [all] Commons SCXML 0.7 RC1 available
Date Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:34:20 GMT
On Dec 8, 2007 9:44 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/8/07, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 08/12/2007, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> <snip/>
> > >
> > > I've been adding clirr reports after the fact (running clirr at
> > > command line) so folks can glance at changes. I agree it would be good
> > > to add a report to the site, I'll need to look at m1 plugin, get it
> > > going etc.
> > >
> >
> > OK, understood.
> >
> > Which reminds me - what about the RAT report?
> >
> <snap/>
>
> Ran RAT on the tag, that report has been added (see
> commons-scxml-0.7-rat-report.txt) here:
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/
>
>
> > >
> > > Yup, doap not necessary. PROPOSAL and STATUS are archival things that
> > > don't really pertain to any release (actually, STATUS is more cruft
> > > than anything else ;-). pom.xml not in since I personally haven't used
> > > the m2 build a lot (but I know atleast 'mvn install' works so I guess
> > > it could be added).
> >
> > s/could/should/ - please ;-)
> >
> <snip/>
>
> :-)
>
> I'll cut RC2 mid next week (to allow for any other feedback between
> now and then) that has the pom.xml in the source distros. Please feel
> free to try out the pom and update it as you see fit within the next
> 2-3 days (I haven't tried the m2 site for example, don't intend to
> either for v0.7 etc.).

+1 from me to include the pom.xml

I just ran mvn site assembly:assembly (on trunk) and it all looked
good except that the 0.7 release menu was missing from the site - so I
just added it (copied from navigation.xml).

The only issue I could see was the cobertura (http://tinyurl.com/2a9ctf) one:

http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/scxml-0.7/rc1/site/cobertura/js/

otherwise looks good.

Niall

> > > I looked at the src zip and the 8 jpegs you list seem to be in there.
> > > Can you point directly to the file that doesn't have them?
> >
> > Sorry, I was wrong ...
> >
> > There was a problem with the extraction process - the files were
> > there, but for some reason they were in a different directory -
> > SCXML-ST instead of scxml-stopwatch.
> >
> <snap/>
>
> Yup, that'd mess with it.
>
>
> > >
> > > Me too, that report generation may not be working. Will have to look
> > > into it at some point (I think we're fairly complete on Javadocs in
> > > general).
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > Maybe drop the report if it does not show anything useful (and avoid
> > possible future questions about it)
> >
> <snip/>
>
> Sounds good (I'll probably take out both reports, Javadoc Report and
> Javadoc Warnings Report).
>
>
> -Rahul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message