commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)
Date Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:31:15 GMT
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> On 18/11/2007, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since the last try:
>>>> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the 
>>>> correct
>>>> place in all distributables
>>>> - A couple of minor bugs were fixed
>>>>
>>>> Release Notes:
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160

>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tag:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/

>>>>
>>
>> I think Rahul has mentioned this:
>>
>> What happened to issue-tracking.xml ?
>> Should issue-tracking.xml.bak be there?
> 
> This was a deliberate file rename on my part, see r595118. Because of 
> the way the file is named no html page will be rendered for it. It will 
> be reinstated later on.
> 
>> Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip:
>>
>> xdocs/**
>> build-testing.xml
>> commons-logging-api.pom
>> doap_logging.rdf
>> PROPOSAL.html
>> STATUS.html
>>
>> Surely at least some of these belong in the distribution?
> 
> The I started preparing the Maven 2 assembly for logging I posted a 
> discussion thread called "What's in a distribution". Consensus was not 
> reached, but I did my best at creating something that would satisfy most 
> people.
> 
> xdocs/** - isn't needed, because the entire generated site is included 
> in the distro
> 
> build-testing.xml - this one should really be in there (was added after 
> I had created the assembly). Good catch!

I have added this to the assembly.

> commons-logging-api.pom - This was a temporary fix that was created to 
> remedy the fact that the automatically (M1 to M2) converted pom in 1.1 
> was a disaster when it came to dependencies. Can probably be deleted 
> from svn now, but shouldn't be in the distro anyway.
> 
> As for the rest - I don't know and I don't care.
> 
> Until we have reached consensus about what files should be in a 
> distribution, I think that it is up to the Release Manager to decide 
> what goes in there.
> 
>>
>>>> Staged repository:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-commons-logging/
>>> Not sure why there are MD5 and SHA1 checksums of the .ASC files -
>>> surely they are redundant?
>>>
>>>  Also, it would be nice if the MD5 files had the file name in them.
>>>
>>>> Distribution files:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip.asc
>>> No MD5 or SHA1 files at all here - there should be at least one or the
>>> other for the zip and .tar.gz files
>>>
>>>> Please cast your votes!
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1, Let's do it
>>>> [ ] -1, Nah
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's my +1
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Dennis Lundberg
>>>>
> 


-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message