commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:05:08 GMT
On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 19/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since the last try:
> >>>> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
> >>>> place in all distributables
> >>>> - A couple of minor bugs were fixed
> >>>>
> >>>> Release Notes:
> >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160
> >>>>
> >>>> Tag:
> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/
> >>>>
> >>>> Staged repository:
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-commons-logging/
> >>>>
> >>>> Distribution files:
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip.asc
> >>>>
> >>> Are these the files that are to be released via Apache mirrors?
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >>> If so, then there should be separate binary and source archives, as
> >>> per the previous release 1.1:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/logging/
> >> No, there will be only one distributed archive which contains both
> >> source and binaries. The archive will be available in .tar.gz and .zip
> >> formats. This was decided back when we discussed what should go into a
> >> distribution.
> >
> > AFAICS Logging will be the only Commons project that will no longer
> > have separate binary and source archives.
> >
> > I think that's a retrograde step.
>
> Here a link to the discussion I mentioned earlier:
> http://www.nabble.com/-all--What%27s-in-a-distribution--tf2910639.html#a8132562
>

Thanks - I was having problems finding that.

There does not seem to have been a final decision (or even summary) of
the e-mail thread, which is a pity. Probably ought to be on the
developer section of the commons site.

However:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--all--What%27s-in-a-distribution--p8133008.html
does ask for the whole of SVN to be included.

AFAICS, only one message supported having a single combined archive;
at least one other message referred to the need to keep archive sizes
small.


> >>>> Please cast your votes!
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1, Let's do it
> >>>> [ ] -1, Nah
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's my +1
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Dennis Lundberg
> >> --
> >> Dennis Lundberg
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message