commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)
Date Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:31:00 GMT
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 18/11/2007, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since the last try:
> >>> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct
> >>> place in all distributables
> >>> - A couple of minor bugs were fixed
> >>>
> >>> Release Notes:
> >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310484&styleName=Html&version=12312160
> >>>
> >>> Tag:
> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/logging/tags/commons-logging-1.1.1/
> >
> > I think Rahul has mentioned this:
> >
> > What happened to issue-tracking.xml ?
> > Should issue-tracking.xml.bak be there?
>
> This was a deliberate file rename on my part, see r595118. Because of
> the way the file is named no html page will be rendered for it. It will
> be reinstated later on.

OK.

> > Some files in the tagged directory tree are not in the distribution zip:
> >
> > xdocs/**
> > build-testing.xml
> > commons-logging-api.pom
> > doap_logging.rdf
> > PROPOSAL.html
> > STATUS.html
> >
> > Surely at least some of these belong in the distribution?
>
> The I started preparing the Maven 2 assembly for logging I posted a
> discussion thread called "What's in a distribution". Consensus was not
> reached, but I did my best at creating something that would satisfy most
> people.
>
> xdocs/** - isn't needed, because the entire generated site is included
> in the distro
> build-testing.xml - this one should really be in there (was added after
> I had created the assembly). Good catch!

I just used WinMerge to compare the tagged files with those in the distribution.

> commons-logging-api.pom - This was a temporary fix that was created to
> remedy the fact that the automatically (M1 to M2) converted pom in 1.1
> was a disaster when it came to dependencies. Can probably be deleted
> from svn now, but shouldn't be in the distro anyway.
>
> As for the rest - I don't know and I don't care.
>
> Until we have reached consensus about what files should be in a
> distribution, I think that it is up to the Release Manager to decide
> what goes in there.

OK.

My view is that the source distribution should contain everything that
is in SVN.

> >
> >>> Staged repository:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-commons-logging/
> >> Not sure why there are MD5 and SHA1 checksums of the .ASC files -
> >> surely they are redundant?
> >>
> >>  Also, it would be nice if the MD5 files had the file name in them.
> >>
> >>> Distribution files:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.tar.gz.asc
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~dennisl/commons-logging-1.1.1.zip.asc
> >> No MD5 or SHA1 files at all here - there should be at least one or the
> >> other for the zip and .tar.gz files
> >>
> >>> Please cast your votes!
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1, Let's do it
> >>> [ ] -1, Nah
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here's my +1
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Dennis Lundberg
> >>>
>
> --
> Dennis Lundberg
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message