Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4185 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2007 20:09:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2007 20:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 8154 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2007 20:09:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 8086 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2007 20:09:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 8077 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2007 20:09:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:09:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.46.255.22] (HELO viefep16-int.chello.at) (213.46.255.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:09:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (really [84.113.196.60]) by viefep16-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20071010200849.CMUX9852.viefep16-int.chello.at@[192.168.0.4]> for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:08:49 +0200 Subject: Re: [logging] 1.1.1 release From: simon To: Jakarta Commons Developers List In-Reply-To: <470BE30B.7030508@apache.org> References: <668020.1191395160703.JavaMail.root@viefep18> <470BE30B.7030508@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:07:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1192046860.6080.2.camel@simon-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dennis, No it's not in JIRA (slack of me I know). Interesting, it appears to only be a problem on Linux then. I have to face the fact that I'm not likely to find time to investigate further anytime soon. I do think it's just a unit test issue rather than a real problem, and the fact that it works for you under Windows supports that. So let's just ignore this problem and go ahead with the release.. Cheers, Simon On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 22:22 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Simon, > > Is this in JIRA somewhere? > > I can run 'ant -f build-testing.xml' with a successful result using Java > 1.6.0_02 on Windows XP. > > Simon Kitching wrote: > > Hi Dennis, > > > > It's great to see you're working towards a JCL release. > > > > However there is one problem that probably should be resolved before the release: the unit tests related to java.util.logging fail on Java 1.6. It looks like the mechanism used by the unit tests to install a custom java.util.logging loghandler works on java 1.5 but not java 1.6. > > > > This is probably just a unit test problem, ie I'm 90% confident that although the tests fail on 1.6 the functionality is working. Nevertheless it would be nice to get this fixed. > > > > I have tonight free so will have another stab at locating the actual problem then. > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org