Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46F81EAD.2090301@oliver-heger.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:31:41 +0200
From: Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)
References: <6185d22e0709240110r70045063i5d281b8094357b0b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46F8187C.3090803@oliver-heger.de>
 <6185d22e0709241322i33d12bb7q48835be4c562cc8a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <6185d22e0709241322i33d12bb7q48835be4c562cc8a@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ben Speakmon wrote:
> I wasn't sure what to make of it either; the release docs don't mention it
> specifically. The source and javadoc jars, BTW, are intended to be deployed
> next to the final build in the maven repo. It won't be hard to make sure
> they get in there. Is there a consensus that it's required for this release?
> 

I don't have an official reference either, but I remember votes that 
were canceled because of this. Here is an example for that I found in 
the archives [1].

Oliver

[1] 
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html

> On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>> Everything looks good, except for one thing, which I think needs to be
>> fixed: the jar with the javadocs does not contain NOTICE.txt and
>> LICENSE.txt. (The jar with the sources contains these files, but they
>> are stored in the top level rather than in META-INF; don't know whether
>> this is problematic.)
>>
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org