commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Speakmon" <bspeak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)
Date Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:04:42 GMT
My key is in trunks-proper (
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper/) but it hasn't been
copied to the main KEYS file yet.

I'll double-check the MD5s. verify_sigs swore they were correct :)

On 9/25/07, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, I can't find the signing key - it does not seem to be in
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> but perhaps it is elsewhere?
>
> On 25/09/2007, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Some of the MD5s don't work for me:
> >
> > BAD MD5 commons-email-1.1-RC2.jar
> > Expect: fb02f6aff49332705084b662a5d8d945
> > Found:  a2d70201e44041f9d9b3d865c615e35f
> >
> > BAD MD5 commons-email-1.1-RC2-bin.tar.gz
> > Expect: f7d933426b68e184047405b52e9bfa0c
> > Found:  770a8da798eb94137e24e03da2904a66
> >
> > BAD MD5 commons-email-1.1-RC2-bin.zip
> > Expect: 21fd56446a77476370d2b0c1bc87b241
> > Found:  1a1b4e432d1ec67af99a66576f53db7e
> >
> > S///
> >  On 24/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > New source and javadoc jars have been uploaded, tag has been
> reapplied,
> > > and
> > > signatures rechecked. Votes again welcome :)
> > >
> > > On 9/24/07, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just wanted to make sure.
> > > >
> > > > I will update the RC sources.jar and javadoc.jar with versions that
> > > put
> > > > the LICENSE/NOTICE in META-INF. I'll check in the POM and retag as
> > > RC2,
> > > > leaving the current RC2 artifacts on people.a.o in place as there
> are
> > > no
> > > > code changes. Is everybody okay with that plan?
> > > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That settles it for me. Do we need to put LICENSE/NOTICE in
> META-INF
> > > in
> > > > > source and javadoc or is the root directory acceptable?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ben Speakmon wrote:
> > > > > > > I wasn't sure what to make of it either; the release docs
> don't
> > > > > > mention it
> > > > > > > specifically. The source and javadoc jars, BTW, are intended
> to
> > > be
> > > > > > deployed
> > > > > > > next to the final build in the maven repo. It won't be
hard to
> > > make
> > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > they get in there. Is there a consensus that it's required
for
> > > this
> > > > > > release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I don't have an official reference either, but I remember votes
> > > that
> > > > > > were canceled because of this. Here is an example for that I
> found
> > > in
> > > > > > the archives [1].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oliver
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > >
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de
>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >> Everything looks good, except for one thing, which
I think
> > > needs to
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > >> fixed: the jar with the javadocs does not contain
> NOTICE.txtand
> > > > > > >> LICENSE.txt. (The jar with the sources contains these
files,
> > > but
> > > > > > they
> > > > > > >> are stored in the top level rather than in META-INF;
don't
> know
> > > > > > whether
> > > > > > >> this is problematic.)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message