commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Speakmon" <bspeak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:09:31 GMT
New source and javadoc jars have been uploaded, tag has been reapplied, and
signatures rechecked. Votes again welcome :)

On 9/24/07, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Just wanted to make sure.
>
> I will update the RC sources.jar and javadoc.jar with versions that put
> the LICENSE/NOTICE in META-INF. I'll check in the POM and retag as RC2,
> leaving the current RC2 artifacts on people.a.o in place as there are no
> code changes. Is everybody okay with that plan?
>
> On 9/24/07, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org > wrote:
> >
> > That settles it for me. Do we need to put LICENSE/NOTICE in META-INF in
> > source and javadoc or is the root directory acceptable?
> >
> > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ben Speakmon wrote:
> > > > I wasn't sure what to make of it either; the release docs don't
> > > mention it
> > > > specifically. The source and javadoc jars, BTW, are intended to be
> > > deployed
> > > > next to the final build in the maven repo. It won't be hard to make
> > > sure
> > > > they get in there. Is there a consensus that it's required for this
> > > release?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I don't have an official reference either, but I remember votes that
> > > were canceled because of this. Here is an example for that I found in
> > > the archives [1].
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> > > >> Everything looks good, except for one thing, which I think needs to
> > > be
> > > >> fixed: the jar with the javadocs does not contain NOTICE.txt and
> > > >> LICENSE.txt. (The jar with the sources contains these files, but
> > > they
> > > >> are stored in the top level rather than in META-INF; don't know
> > > whether
> > > >> this is problematic.)
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message