commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Speakmon" <bspeak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:33:21 GMT
That settles it for me. Do we need to put LICENSE/NOTICE in META-INF in
source and javadoc or is the root directory acceptable?

On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>
> Ben Speakmon wrote:
> > I wasn't sure what to make of it either; the release docs don't mention
> it
> > specifically. The source and javadoc jars, BTW, are intended to be
> deployed
> > next to the final build in the maven repo. It won't be hard to make sure
> > they get in there. Is there a consensus that it's required for this
> release?
> >
>
> I don't have an official reference either, but I remember votes that
> were canceled because of this. Here is an example for that I found in
> the archives [1].
>
> Oliver
>
> [1]
>
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
>
> > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> >> Everything looks good, except for one thing, which I think needs to be
> >> fixed: the jar with the javadocs does not contain NOTICE.txt and
> >> LICENSE.txt. (The jar with the sources contains these files, but they
> >> are stored in the top level rather than in META-INF; don't know whether
> >> this is problematic.)
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message