commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Email 1.1 (RC2)
Date Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:13:13 GMT
Ah, OK.

BTW, where/what is this verify_sigs tool?


On 27/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org> wrote:
> It wasn't verify_sigs fault; I just uploaded the wrong file. When I ran it
> on the files I downloaded from RC2/, it complained correctly.
>
> On 9/26/07, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All the MD5 and ASC files check out OK now.
> >
> > Why did verify_sigs not complain before?
> > If it's faulty, it needs to be fixed - or abandoned as a check.
> >
> > S.
> > On 26/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Turns out those assemblies had an outdated POM in them. I've rebuilt
> > them
> > > with the pom tagged as RC2. Since there were no other changes, I
> > replaced
> > > the broken ones in my RC2/ directory with the new ones.
> > >
> > > Can you please recheck?
> > >
> > > On 9/25/07, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK, I've now got your key.
> > > >
> > > > However, the following sigs don't work for me:
> > > >
> > > > commons-email-1.1-RC2-bin.zip.asc
> > > > commons-email-1.1-RC2-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > > > commons-email-1.1-RC2.jar.asc
> > > >
> > > > Same files that have the MD5 problems.
> > > >
> > > > S///
> > > >
> > > > On 25/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > My key is in trunks-proper (
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper/) but it
> > hasn't
> > > > been
> > > > > copied to the main KEYS file yet.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll double-check the MD5s. verify_sigs swore they were correct :)
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/25/07, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, I can't find the signing key - it does not seem to be
in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > but perhaps it is elsewhere?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 25/09/2007, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Some of the MD5s don't work for me:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BAD MD5 commons-email-1.1-RC2.jar
> > > > > > > Expect: fb02f6aff49332705084b662a5d8d945
> > > > > > > Found:  a2d70201e44041f9d9b3d865c615e35f
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BAD MD5 commons-email-1.1-RC2-bin.tar.gz
> > > > > > > Expect: f7d933426b68e184047405b52e9bfa0c
> > > > > > > Found:  770a8da798eb94137e24e03da2904a66
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > BAD MD5 commons-email-1.1-RC2-bin.zip
> > > > > > > Expect: 21fd56446a77476370d2b0c1bc87b241
> > > > > > > Found:  1a1b4e432d1ec67af99a66576f53db7e
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > S///
> > > > > > >  On 24/09/2007, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > New source and javadoc jars have been uploaded, tag
has been
> > > > > > reapplied,
> > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > signatures rechecked. Votes again welcome :)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just wanted to make sure.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will update the RC sources.jar and javadoc.jar
with
> > versions
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > > put
> > > > > > > > > the LICENSE/NOTICE in META-INF. I'll check in
the POM and
> > retag
> > > > as
> > > > > > > > RC2,
> > > > > > > > > leaving the current RC2 artifacts on people.a.o
in place as
> > > > there
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > code changes. Is everybody okay with that plan?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Ben Speakmon <bspeakmon@apache.org
> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That settles it for me. Do we need to put
LICENSE/NOTICE
> > in
> > > > > > META-INF
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > source and javadoc or is the root directory
acceptable?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Ben Speakmon wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I wasn't sure what to make of
it either; the release
> > docs
> > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > > > mention it
> > > > > > > > > > > > specifically. The source and javadoc
jars, BTW, are
> > > > intended
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > deployed
> > > > > > > > > > > > next to the final build in the
maven repo. It won't be
> > > > hard
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > sure
> > > > > > > > > > > > they get in there. Is there a
consensus that it's
> > required
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > release?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I don't have an official reference
either, but I
> > remember
> > > > > votes
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > were canceled because of this. Here
is an example for
> > that I
> > > > > > found
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > the archives [1].
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Oliver
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--3rd-attempt:-Release-commons-io-1.3.2-t3880798.html
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Oliver Heger <oliver.heger@oliver-heger.de>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Everything looks good, except
for one thing, which I
> > > > think
> > > > > > > > needs to
> > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > >> fixed: the jar with the javadocs
does not contain
> > > > > > NOTICE.txtand
> > > > > > > > > > > >> LICENSE.txt. (The jar with
the sources contains these
> > > > > files,
> > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > >> are stored in the top level
rather than in META-INF;
> > > > don't
> > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > > > whether
> > > > > > > > > > > >> this is problematic.)
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > dev-help@commons.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message