Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66983 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2007 15:57:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2007 15:57:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 93901 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2007 15:57:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-commons-dev-archive@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 93808 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2007 15:57:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@commons.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@commons.apache.org Received: (qmail 93799 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2007 15:57:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:57:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mfncooper@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.225 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.225] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.225) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:57:35 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id m22so806849nzf for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Er8lfJygF0Zn1DdIGjHD+VL/UGZnyJv40xkCoOZM4KnLm6Fc2eLNA/y4+yF/BdwVVNetkDlYacY0AmDnOsapKtn3NQIl+019VxyLMxOfbcID50JRIzaj5o8AIsVKnosnqctNBywwFQF6GMI+N65t941vLZYN0o1FvZM5SAYk7lk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=UfM9FjIk0DGp1HhWG7BRBnVPgluUGF/Ux36GuGwsQHkBhrXf7rX4xnERhGkUV3SkF5+4wvGoePgH4C+nsPHZMVK0wKX5201qga5c8WsGiz1duo4D7Oa9dcZlk4sTDBhBkJt/Y11X1AOk4dFawDsrKvwVwauobgSekfarnaCTPKE= Received: by 10.141.27.18 with SMTP id e18mr567191rvj.1188057434108; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.76.13 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <16d6c6200708250857r2100bee5g1d9533dab75a64c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:57:14 -0700 From: "Martin Cooper" Sender: mfncooper@gmail.com To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_71491_16607221.1188057434089" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: c6aaefec8de49afa X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_71491_16607221.1188057434089 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/25/07, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Why not use the Gump output for the nightlies? > > Because GUMP builds are deemed non-trusted, since GUMP downloads from > non-ASF sites and includes them in builds without any vetting of the third > party dependencies. True, but it's not clear that everything in the public Maven repo should be considered as "vetted" either. What did occur to me - _after_ I sent my previous message, of course - is that Gump builds against the latest of everything, and not a specified set of versions (unless we're circumventing that deliberately). That's a pretty good reason not to use it for nightlies. -- Martin Cooper --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org > > ------=_Part_71491_16607221.1188057434089--