commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Benedict" <pbened...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:24:46 GMT
I don't see a problem with having builds generated only on changes. I would
prefer that. But will all of ASF do the same? I would find it difficult to
determine what group is doing what: either nightly auto-builds or builds
daily only on commit.

Paul

On 8/26/07, Brett Porter <brett.porter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/08/07, Dion Gillard <dion@trongus.com> wrote:
> > > Given that, isn't Gump producing something closer to what we want for
> > > nightly builds than Continuum? Why not use the Gump output for the
> > > nightlies?
> >
> > On the other hand, why produce a new nightly if nothing's changed?
>
> Yah, Continuum certainly can spit out a whole new one every night if
> you want - it just doesn't make sense if the code hasn't changed
> (unless you are including development versions of dependencies that
> aren't in Continuum - which I don't believe would be the case for
> Commons).
>
> - Brett
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message