commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brett Porter" <brett.por...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [all][poll] How should nigthlies / CI work?
Date Sun, 26 Aug 2007 23:45:19 GMT
On 26/08/07, Dion Gillard <dion@trongus.com> wrote:
> > Given that, isn't Gump producing something closer to what we want for
> > nightly builds than Continuum? Why not use the Gump output for the
> > nightlies?
>
> On the other hand, why produce a new nightly if nothing's changed?

Yah, Continuum certainly can spit out a whole new one every night if
you want - it just doesn't make sense if the code hasn't changed
(unless you are including development versions of dependencies that
aren't in Continuum - which I don't believe would be the case for
Commons).

- Brett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org


Mime
View raw message