commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ben Speakmon" <bspeak...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RESULT] 3rd attempt: Release commons-io 1.3.2
Date Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:42:32 GMT
Is there anything at stake beyond the version number? If it's called
1.4instead of
1.3.2, does that fully answer the concern?

On 6/19/07, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/19/07, Dion Gillard <dion@trongus.com> wrote:
> > I believe you're right.
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/site/proposal.html#decisions/items/plan says
> > "...Majority
> > approval is required before the public release can be made."
> >
> >
>
> Yes, that is the policy, but I have never seen us move forward with a
> release with an unresolved -1 in commons.  Could be this has happened,
> but not in the last 4 or so years.
>
> It is up to the RM, but with a -1 from a major contributor to the code
> base, I would personally not push out the release.  FWIW, as mentioned
> on other threads, I agree with Stephen on the version number issue.
>
> Phil
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message