commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martin van den Bemt <mll...@mvdb.net>
Subject Re: infrastructure work for TLP move
Date Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:14:02 GMT
I don't see a problem in doing the last 2 years, which kind of gives us a nice clean "committer"
base and if we miss people, they simply need to ask for it.
Another options is just copy & pasting the jakarta committers block from asf-authorization,
that way
you know everyone who has access, still has access..

Mvgr,
Martin

Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 6/27/07, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/28/07, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 6/27/07, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > On 6/28/07, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > On 6/27/07, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > Personally, my vote would be to say:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > commons=committers
>> > > >
>> > > > You mean all apache committers?  I agree that we should continue
>> the
>> > > > tradition of granting commons karma to any committer who asks
>> for it.
>> > > > I don't know much about how this works in svn or what the risk /
>> > > > downside of auto-granting commons karma to new committers would be,
>> > > > but I agree with the principle that any ASF committer should be
>> > > > welcome here.
>> > > >
>> > > > There are also a lot of current commons committers missing from the
>> > > > list above.  My preference would be to have them remain commons
>> > > > committers if that is not too hard to do. In any case, any current
>> > > > commons committer who wants karma should get it.
>> > >
>> > > I agree - please lets not remove commit privledge from anyone who
>> > > currently has it in Commons.
>> >
>> > Presuming no one recognizes the social genius of my first proposal,
>> > then I recommend that we make the list of committers be anyone who has
>> > committed in the last 2 years.
>>
>> Why have you gone from proposing to add any remaining ASF Commiters
>> that don't currently have access to now removing access from anyone
>> who hasn't committed in the last two years? This seems a bit random in
>> principle to me to take one position to open things up one minute and
>> then another to make it more restrictive the next.
> 
> Just looking for something simple.
> 
>> I also dislike arbitrary limits - you choose 2 years - maybe someone
>> else will prefer 1 year and so on. I still think anyone that currently
>> has access should keep it and not loose their commit access to
>> Commons.
> 
> Pondered that one. We could keep the commons commit list as the
> jakarta group. Seemed a bit odd though.
> 
> Hen
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message