commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [functor] revival WAS Functor Users / Project Management?
Date Wed, 30 May 2007 16:38:21 GMT

--- Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akolkar@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 5/30/07, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Pete--
> >
> >   I could be interested in being the Jakarta
> commons
> > conduit for a revival of the functor code. 
> According
> > to the jakarta website, "A revival of a Commons
> > Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on
> the
> > commons developers mailing list."  Is there a
> general
> > feeling on-list as to whether the vote should be
> held,
> <snip/>
> 
> I think its good to have the vote as suggested
> (after any preliminary
> discussion here). While its a lower bar than sandbox
> graduation, I
> think its useful to gauge interest and makes it
> harder for the change
> to slip under people's radar etc. As an aside, I do
> not have any
> cycles to help with functor ATM.

Right, I meant "whether the vote should be held" as in
"are there any reasons why reviving [functor] would be
simply out of the question?"  I wasn't implying any
desire to circumvent established protocols.  :)

-Matt

> 
> -Rahul
[SNIP]



       
____________________________________________________________________________________Get the
Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message