commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pember...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 RC1
Date Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:21:14 GMT
On 2/1/07, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> Might have to stop the vote anyway as it looks like the refactoring to
> Entities.java undid an optimisation issue.
>
> On 2/1/07, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schaible@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Correction: Tests did *not* run:
> > Testcase: testLang312(org.apache.commons.lang.time.DateFormatUtilsTest):
> > FAILED
> > It's the part of the fixture that tests the JDK ... maybe this should not be
> > asserted and better be replaced by a simple sysout? In the end you cannot
> > know what was changed/fixed by Sun in which JDK version (and if the
> > assumption is valid for other JDKs) and it does not make sense to rely our
> > tests on such a behavior.
>
> How depressing. Yeah I think the best thing to do here is to test and
> then print a WARNING rather than having JUnit fail.
>
> > Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Rebuild from the src package with Sun JDK 5 under Linux.
> > >
> > > Minor: I understand that the proposal is a historical document, but it
> > > claims that c-lang is build on top of JDK 1.2 ... that might be confusing.
>
> What do people think - update PROPOSALs or delete them?

Neither - leave it unchanged. It is historical and I think it is
obvious it is, many (most?) components have them and I've never seen
it raised as a cause for confusion.

Niall

> Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message