commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Lang 2.3 RC1
Date Sat, 03 Feb 2007 10:51:40 GMT
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/1/07, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > What do people think - update PROPOSALs or delete them?
>>
>> Neither - leave it unchanged. It is historical and I think it is
>> obvious it is, many (most?) components have them and I've never seen
>> it raised as a cause for confusion.
>>
> <snap/>
> 
> Archival is good, I read proposals. But from trunk. One way to avoid
> potential confusion is to not make it part of the distros, if indeed
> it is added there.

I think the proposal should no longer be part of the website or distro, 
but left unchanged in SVN. There may be a case for an updated scope doc 
on the website (ie. a new xdoc).

Stephen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message