Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of niall.pemberton@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=CvFIrxr04E8U18HQNxsg9kAH0I3dqklcMbjcU8iBUOBeYHMNl8mNbNZFJ1CgYx2kq5z1vjZUzwrpNzWLVzFAuYrRw17BP33Ub5aCx8irlJ4zr8vshila3zl01ju6SeFAtzXN0HN4hsqSb7dA3yyaPeAbLORknIOKP/Udqx8G9zo=
Message-ID: <55afdc850612110430t29378fd9tcb7e1969788c5a73@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:30:11 +0000
From: "Niall Pemberton" <niall.pemberton@gmail.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE][VFS] release commons-vfs 1.0 based on RC8
In-Reply-To: <55afdc850612110337j2ce4245o5b9ec6bcf2bce666@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <457A827F.3040701@ops.co.at>
	 <55afdc850612110337j2ce4245o5b9ec6bcf2bce666@mail.gmail.com>

I just thought about running the RAT tool over the source distro -
popped up 65 files missing source file license headers - including 10
java class files - I have fixed the ones that seemed to matter:
    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=485638

Since I think the above warrants a new RC, I went ahead a committed
the chanegs to the project.xml as well:
   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=485643

Niall

On 12/11/06, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@gmail.com> wrote:
> The RC looks pretty good, just a couple of comments/questions:
>
> 1) Theres a failing test - does it matter?
>      http://tinyurl.com/ymh763
>
> 2) The dependencies are mis-leading since they include slide and jcifs
> which are in the vfs sandbox and not part of the release:
>     http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs-1.0-RC8/site/dependencies.html
> patch to correct this (and add urls and "optional" to the dependencies) here:
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-100
>
> 3) Is it intentional to not include the vfs sandbox code in the source
> distribution?
>
> Niall
>
> On 12/9/06, Mario Ivankovits <mario@ops.co.at> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > After an eventful year and some help from others I managed to cut a new RC.
> >
> >
> > Please find the RC at
> > http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs
> >
> > The site can be reviewed at
> > http://people.apache.org/~imario/vfs-1.0-RC8/site
> >
> >
> > *) imported commons-compress into vfs codebase to get rid of snapshot
> > dependency
> > *) moved webdav implementation to the vfs sandbox due to the fact that
> > webdavclient seems not active and no new release is on the way
> > *) moved smb implemenation to the vfs sandbox due to licensing issues.
> > Now that we sorted out how to deal with LGPL I'll move it back for a 1.1
> > release
> > *) some bugfixes along the way
> >
> >
> > Thanks to all supporters of commons-VFS!
> >
> >
> > I'll cut a 1.0 release based on RC8, so please take some time and review
> > the distribution
> >
> > ------------
> > [ ] +1  I support this release
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -0
> > [ ] -1  I do not support this release because...
> > ------------
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your time!
> >
> > ---
> > Mario
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org