commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Torsten Curdt" <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Major versions require package name change
Date Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:16:58 GMT
On 11/7/06, Joerg Heinicke <> wrote:
> Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne <at>> writes:
> > The major version number of a component, where it is greater than 1,
> > shall be included in the package name.
> I really wonder why this should be a concern of the actual component at all. A
> component is an encapsulated piece of software with a well-defined interface
> (here API). If there are problems in the environment in using this component or
> looking it up (here jar hell/classpath), then this is a problem of the
> environment, not a concern of the component. Therefore this thing has also to be
> fixed in the environment.
> Classloader shielding is an appropriate solution. There is much ongoing work
> like OSGi to standardize this and make it easier usable. So I wonder why this is
> now still such a major topic though it worked ten years without it. Maybe in 2
> or 3 years nobody will talk about it at all when classloader shielding is so
> common and easily usable.

Classloader shielding does not help if your application uses libA and libB both
having dependencies on libC ...but of different versions - that are

I fail see how that is environment related.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message