Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43682 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2006 08:24:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2006 08:24:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 90729 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2006 08:24:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90628 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2006 08:24:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90617 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2006 08:24:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:24:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2006 01:24:47 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB86F41001D for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:22:16 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <12327870.1154420536765.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:22:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Oliver Zeigermann (JIRA)" To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (TRANSACTION-11) Improve relationship between ResourceManager and FileResourceManager In-Reply-To: <23465821.1154384413897.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSACTION-11?page=comments#action_12424790 ] Oliver Zeigermann commented on TRANSACTION-11: ---------------------------------------------- Are you sure this has priority major? Hardly, I think... Anyway, as discussed earlier ResourceManager rather is some relict from times were people thought there might be other implementations than FileResourceManager for it. This has never happened and most likely never will. So by simply using FileResourceManager as your type instead of ResourceManager should be save. This would make your patch obsolete, right? > Improve relationship between ResourceManager and FileResourceManager > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TRANSACTION-11 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRANSACTION-11 > Project: Commons Transaction > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 1.1, 1.2 > Reporter: Jeremy Fujimoto-Johnson > Assigned To: Oliver Zeigermann > Attachments: commons-transaction-rm-patch.txt > > > Add the reset method to ResourceManager so that classes using a ResourceManager won't have to cast it to FileResourceManager to call this method. > Add new constructors to FileResourceManager so that it can be constructed with the default timeout period for transactions already specified so that you don't have to cast to FileResourceManager to set it later. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org