commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject RE: [logging] Tapestry and JCL
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:14:45 GMT
Regardless, it's still not an ASF project.  We should try to "eat our own
dog food" IMHO.  If we don't use our own libraries because we think they're
sub-par, then why should anyone else?

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:scolebourne@btopenworld.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [logging] Tapestry and JCL

From: James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
> Thoughts?"
> I would really hate to see an
> Apache TLP, java-based project switch off JCL in favor of a non-ASF
> logging API.

Unless I'm mistaken, SLF4J comes from Ceki, creator of Log4J. Thus the SLF4J
website and separation is as much for political reasons as anything else.
(ie, if it was release as part of Log4J, people wouldn't see it as truly
independent of Log4J)

Stephen





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message