Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jak-commons-dev@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender)
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
From: "Bill Barker" <wbarker@wilshire.com>
Subject: Re: [Modeler] Resync and Release for commons-modeler
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:22:18 -0700
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <e636uh$akf$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <19e0530f0606032003m25d07cf6n731e8b7aa040421d@mail.gmail.com>
 <4482A586.4090108@apache.org> <e5vc06$onj$1@sea.gmane.org>
 <e605ul$u3q$1@sea.gmane.org> <44841C7D.5080200@apache.org>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>


"Dennis Lundberg" <dennisl@apache.org> wrote in message 
news:44841C7D.5080200@apache.org...
> I've done some issue-management on modeler.
>
> Bill Barker wrote:
>> As I remarked in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411629&view=rev, 
>> resyncing with Tomcat's version of Modeler will never get accepted by the 
>> Tomcat team for TC 5.x.  However, I promise to patch TC5 to fix 
>> MODELER-15 once it is decided to upgrade.
>
> From a Modeler point of view, don't you think that MODELER-15 has been 
> resolved?
>
>> MODELER-17 is fixed now (but I lack karma to mark it as such :).
>
> Marked as resolved.
>
>> I consider MODELER-10 to be INVALID (for reasons explained there, but 
>> again, there is that karma thing :).
>
> Marked as invalid.
>
>
>> I consider MODELER-3 to be assigned to Dennis.
>
> Committed and resolved.
>
>> MODELER-2 is already fixed, but just not marked as such.
>
> Marked as resolved.
>
> > I lack karma to fix MODELER-6, and really don't care all that much.
>
> Tested and marked as invalid.
>
>> That pretty much covers the state of open issues with [modeler].  Once 
>> Dennis has committed his patch, I see no reason for somebody not to step 
>> up and RM a [VOTE].
>
> What version are we looking at here?
> 1.1.1 or 1.2?
>

It's primarily a bug-fix release at the moment, so I'd go for 1.1.1. 
However, it's really up to whoever steps up to RM the release :).

>
> <snip>
>
> -- 
> Dennis Lundberg 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org