commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dennis Lundberg <denn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [all] change group id? [WAS Re: [logging] RC on ibiblio ?]
Date Sat, 20 May 2006 18:49:16 GMT
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 5/18/06, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
>> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > On 5/13/06, robert burrell donkin 
>> <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 08:51 +0200, Nicolas De Loof wrote:
>> >> > I agree about NOT making non-final jars available on ibiblio
>> >> (httpclient
>> >> > beeing an exception)
>> >> > So could the next RC be uploaded to
>> >> > http://cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/ ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Please also consider using the new groupId recommandation for apache
>> >> > commons-X : org.apache.commons.X
>> >>
>> >> should we make this change for the whole of the commons?
>> >
>> > Opening this up again.
>> >
>> > groupId: org.apache.commons
>> > or
>> > groupId: org.apache.commons.X
>> >
>> > ??
>>
>> As one of the goals in the commons charter (12) is to have one jar (=one
>> artifact) per subproject, I believe that org.apache.commons will work
>> nicely.
>>
>> > The M2 repository has a better hierarchical structure, so I'm not sure
>> > we have to worry about jamming X in place.
>> >
>> > Here's the m2 repo for my commons-alike testing project:
>> >
>> > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/genjava/
>> >
>> > I'm thinking a group id of org.apache.commons for each component would
>> > work well.
>> >
>> > We've got both logging and collections in need of deployment. Also
>> > need to start putting the javadoc and sources in there too if
>> > possible.
>>
>> What would be the best way to do this? Should we try to cram this into
>> the Apache Maven 1 repo or should we start to provide Maven 2 POMs for
>> all commons components instead? The Maven 2 repo has better support for
>> these kinds of extras.
> 
> Maven 1 repo; until we start doing it automatically from an m2 build
> system. Less chance of us messing up the m2 repo that way.

So, should we go ahead and do this or does it require a vote?

<snip/>

-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message