On 5/2/06, Martin Cooper <martinc@apache.org> wrote:
> On 5/2/06, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > We'd suck all the data into a project in Jira called Commons. Then
> > we'd move stuff out of it into individual projects until we had just
> > [site]/[all] issues left. Then we'd delete the versions and components
> > in that Jira project and it becomes our catch-all Jira project.
>
>
> The problem with that is that you can be sure that plenty of people will
> file issues under something called just "Commons" without looking for the
> component. We'd be better off, IMHO, creating explicit components for 'site'
> and 'all'. (I'm not at all convinced we need the latter, though, since there
> would be issues with figuring out when it's ready to be marked Closed.)
It does sound likely. Looking at Bugzilla, there are 6 issues for
[site], one of which was more to do with the build system.
Let's go ahead and have a Commons Site project, and forget about the
all bit, or keeping the Commons project used for the migration.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|