commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carlos Sanchez" <car...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [logging] Maven 2 POM(s) for commons-logging [Was: RE : [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Jakarta Commons Logging 1.1 Released]
Date Mon, 15 May 2006 21:21:38 GMT
I'm gonna tweak the poms in the repository outside of apache, please
add the optional property in the optional dependencies for future
versions.

I'll take a look to the other jars to make poms.

On 5/15/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 20:51 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> > Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > > Hi,n
> > > Thanks it's great job which fixes some troubles.
> > > But I have a trouble concerning the pom published [1].
> > > I have recorded an MEV issue [2]
> > > A commons-logging developper's can put a comment or approve it ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > - Olivier
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-logging/commons-logging/1.1/commons-logging-1.1.pom
> > > [2] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-392
> >
> > <snip/>
> >
> > I have written a comment in the JIRA issue about why the situation is
> > the way it is.
>
> looks good :-)
>
> > The question is how we should proceed? Should we try to
> > tweak the POM that is currently deployed [1]
>
> i didn't deploy that POM and don't have karma: we'd need to talk the to
> maven team.
>
> it's too late for me to change the release POM deployed to the Apache
> repository: it's cut. the easiest approach would be for one of the maven
> team (who has karma) to apply appropriate modifications to the POM
> version in the maven 2 repository.
>
> > or should we try to create a POM for commons-logging-api or perhaps both?
>
> not sure
>
> the API works best as a virtual dependency. it can be satisfied by JCL
> 1.0.x, 1.1.x, by ceki's adapter or by Torsten's null implementation. not
> sure whether maven 2 handles this ATM.
>
> but the API jar contains more than is necessary for this purpose.
> probably carlos is right that all the dependencies need to be marked as
> optional but the full JCL jar shipped.
>
> not sure...
>
> - robert
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


-- 
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message