robert burrell donkin a écrit :
> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 12:42 -0400, Sandy McArthur wrote:
>> -0 because for me, and mentioned by some others, the name "scxml" is
>> so opaque. When I look at the name I have no clue what it is. I know
>> it's verbose but simply expanding the "SC" to StateChartXML would
>> change my mind to full support. (The "StateChartXML" name would be the
>> same length as "Configuration".)
>
> +1
>
> i also prefer statechartXML or even commons-statechart
+1 for commons-statechart, that sounds better and is more descriptive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|