commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell" <flame...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [compress] New draft 5
Date Mon, 01 May 2006 06:49:12 GMT
On 4/30/06, C. Grobmeier <grobmeier@possessed.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello all,
>
> here is a new draft for the compress interface:
>
> * http://grobmeier.de/commons-compress-draft-5.zip

My fault for only just joining in etc, but why have the underlying
Tar/Zip classes become package scoped? Does the bridging API replace
all need to dig into the lower-level APIs?

If so, why are the bzip classes still public?

Should there be ZipCompressor and GZipCompressor implementations?

Any reason for there not being an archiveToStream method? Especially
in the case of the Tar implementation where you'd want to attach a
TarArchiver to a GZipCompressor.

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message