On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 23:58 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On 4/28/06, Dennis Lundberg <dennisl@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I think that having a naming scheme is a good idea. From a user
> >> standpoint I see no reason for keeping the project ids short (3-4
> >> characters). If Jakarta will be sharing the Jira instance with other ASF
> >> projects then using a J prefix for Jakarta project should be used, like
> >> this:
> >> - JLANG
> >> - JDIGESTER
> >> - JCOLLECTIONS
> >> - JHTTPCORE
> >
> > It does seem to be that there's more interest in the full name than
> > the shorter one.
> >
> > In terms of the J***, we should we be asking infra@ what they want to do.
>
> If infra don't require us to use a prefix then we shouldn't use one.
> Keep it as simple as possible, but still readable.
Folks,
Then I will go ahead and try to scrap the existing project and create a
new one with JHTTPCORE as the project id. Please complain loudly if you
have any objections to that.
Oleg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|