commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [feedparser] News / Status
Date Thu, 02 Mar 2006 22:50:21 GMT
On 3/2/06, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> I would have to agree that the release process is a bit daunting.  That's
> why I haven't released Commons Proxy 1.0 yet.  I really don't know how to do
> all of that stuff on the release preparation document (md5 signatures and
> the like).
>
<snip/>

Is that really the only reason? With [proxy] (and [scxml] as well),
one of the glaring reasons I see is that they're still in sandbox. We
*couldn't* release them right now, irrespective of how daunting the
task of cutting a release may be. I'd say, its different.

-Rahul



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akolkar@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:07 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status
>
> On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton <niall.pemberton@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> > For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
> > and Feedparser
> >
> > http://tailrank.com/code.php
> >
> > Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF.
> >
> <snip/>
>
> That appears to be the perception, if so, its unfortunate. Generally
> speaking, if the "procedures" and "awareness of procedures" vectors
> don't reasonably align, the tug of war hurts momentum.
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> > Niall
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message