commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rahul Akolkar" <rahul.akol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [lang] initial crack at DateRange class
Date Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:41:13 GMT
On 3/1/06, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:26 -0800, matthew.hawthorne wrote:
> > Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > > The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang]
> > > should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and
> > > strange things to consider when dealing with dates.
> >
> > Understood.  Well, in the meanwhile, it's in Bugzilla until a final
> > yes/no decision is appropriate.  I had a need for the class, but if
> > [lang] isn't a good fit, then that's obviously fine too.
>
> i've been using similar DateRange objects for the last three years. they
> proved very useful and popular. there are lots of very useful set
> theoretic operations possible on collectives.
>
<snip/>

<OT>
No doubt its popular, someone even contributed a dateRange RDC [1] few
months back.
</OT>

-Rahul

[1] http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/rdc-doc/index.html#dateRange

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message