commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter Steijn" <>
Subject Re: Dbcp unit test failures with Pool 1.3 [was: [VOTE] Release Pool 1.3 based on 1.3-rc4]
Date Wed, 29 Mar 2006 04:23:36 GMT
> I haven't dug into Dbcp code but I think the GenericObjectPool is deep
> within Dbcp as an internal data structure and I'd be surprised if it
> let you specify a specific pool implementation.

Does anyone else think that this should be different?

Suggestion: The next version of DBCP should allow you to specify your own
implementation in a configuration file.  I know that I was looking around
for this feature when I first was exploring DBCP and POOL.


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message