commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [latka] move to sandbox?
Date Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:14:18 GMT
Based on that description, +1. If it hasn't even reached 1.0, I don't
think it should be in proper.

- Brett

Henri Yandell wrote:
> What to do with Latka?
> 
> It's failling to build in gump at the moment, it's not had a release
> in 2 and a half years, and that was 1.0-alpha1. Presumably its only
> release, based on the tags in svn - and lastly I don't think there are
> any active developers.
> 
> Digging in SVN, I'd hazard that it was last really active over 3 years
> ago. Its eponymous class - Latka - was last seriously edited over
> three years ago.
> 
> My thought is that we should relegate it to the sandbox's dormant section.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Hen
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message